Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IP4 Space

  • From: Andy Davidson
  • Date: Fri Mar 05 07:22:50 2010

On 04/03/2010 19:30, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> wrote:
>> handling the v6 table is not currently hard (~2600 prefixes) while long
>> term the temptation to do TE is roughly that same in v6 as in v4, the
>> prospect of having a bunch of non-aggregatable direct assignments should
>> be much lower...
> Because we expect far fewer end users to multihome tomorrow than do today?

The opposite, but a clean slate means multihomed networks with many v4
prefixes may be able to be a multihomed network with just one v6 prefix.

Andy





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.