North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: RBN and it's spin-offs
- From: Paul Ferguson
- Date: Wed Dec 30 23:12:42 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedcalf@dessus.com> wrote:
>
> Without a warrant, there is an absolute right to privacy.
> It continues to exist right up until either (a) one party chooses
> to give up that privacy or (b) a third party arrives with a Court
> Order. This is simply a covenant between two parties to preserve
> that "private" state unless lawfully compelled by lawful process
> otherwise. In other words, a covenant to adhere to the rule of
> law and the courts in the event of any dispute between the parties
> or any third party. It sure seems like a good thing to me -- and a
> covenant I would hope anyone I do business adheres to.
>
That's funny.
You're assuming that the MLAT [1] process works -- it doesn't.
- - ferg
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mutual_Legal_Assistance_Treaty
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
wj8DBQFLPCSVq1pz9mNUZTMRAmtnAKCMrUkoeVmgHf+4z5/os5zfuVKLkwCgkE1G
cq4Iv0qlUZD6V6/txAPoh3Q=
=4RZt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawgster(at)gmail.com
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
|
