North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: IPv6 allocations, deaggregation, etc.
- From: Nathan Ward
- Date: Tue Dec 22 22:02:37 2009
On 23/12/2009, at 3:52 PM, George Bonser wrote:
If you can justify getting a /32, then I suggest you do so, but if
not
then don't worry, a /48 will work just fine. The networks that do
filter you will pretty soon adapt I expect.
I can't in good conscience justify a /32. That is just too much
space.
I believe I can, however, justify a separate /48 in Europe and APAC
with
my various offices and data centers in that region coming from the /48
for that region.
I'm not sure it's about good conscience and worrying about address
space wastage anymore. I mean sure, don't go ask for a /8 or
something, but follow the RIR guidelines - don't paint yourself in to
a corner later by trying to save the world now.
If you are assigning addresses to customers, you should have a /32
allocation. If you are an end user of addresses, you should have a /48
portable assignment. In APNIC world anyway, I'm not sure of the terms
and policies used in other regions.
--
Nathan Ward
|
