Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: IPv6 Deployment for the LAN

  • From: Owen DeLong
  • Date: Wed Oct 21 16:05:57 2009

On Oct 21, 2009, at 12:46 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:

On 18 okt 2009, at 10:03, Andy Davidson wrote:

Support default-routing options for DHCPv6 !
This would be a big mistake. Fate sharing between the device that advertises the presence of a router and the device that forwards packets makes RAs much more robust than DHCPv4. And DHCPv6 is just a case of very bad design, don't expect it to work well without bending over backwards even farther than you're used to with DHCPv4. It's time for this DHC stuff to reach its final resting place.
You keep arguing this and you're still wrong.

There are very good reasons that some people need this in their real world networks.

I'm happy for you that you don't need or want to run DHCPv6 in your environment.
I'm somewhat happy for me that I almost don't need it in mine.

However, making it available as an option in DHCPv6 allows the end- user/operator
to choose the technology that fits their needs best. I do not know why you are so
determined to prevent this choice at the operator level.

Owen






Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.