Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Dutch ISPs to collaborate and take responsibility

  • From: Michael Painter
  • Date: Fri Oct 09 23:27:02 2009

Lee wrote:
If an ISP is involved with tracking down DDOS participants or
something, I can understand how they'd know a system was compromised.
But any kind of blocking because the ISP sees 'anomalous' traffic
seems .. premature at best.  SANS newsbites has this bit:
 On Thursday, October 8, Comcast began testing a service that alerts its
 broadband subscribers with pop-ups if their computers appear to be
 infected with malware.  Among the indicative behaviors that trigger
 alerts are spikes in overnight traffic, suggesting the machine has been
 compromised and is being used to send spam.

When my son comes home from college, there's a huge spike in overnight
traffic from my house.  With all the people advocating immediate
blocking of pwned systems in this thread, I'm wondering what their
criteria is for deciding that the system is compromised & should be
blocked.

Lee
Some info. here (from http://networkmanagement.comcast.net/ ):
5. Detection of Bots
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-oreirdan-mody-bot-remediation-03 http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-livingood-web-notification-00




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.