|
North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: 109/8 - not a BOGON
- From: Shane Short
- Date: Fri Oct 09 07:43:20 2009
Hi Matthew,
I had the same problem with our new range assigned to us by APNIC, out
of 110/8
You're in for a long, hard and frustrating road.
If you manage to get in contact with anyone, or anyone responds to
you, mind letting me know? I'd suspect they'd probably have us blocked
still too, we've just not come across it yet.
Regards,
Shane Short
On 09/10/2009, at 7:22 PM, Matthew Walster wrote:
Hi there,
A customer of mine is reporting that there are a large number of
addresses
he can not reach with his addresses in the 109/8 range. This was
declassified as a BOGON and assigned by IANA to RIPE in January 2009.
If you have a manually updated BOGON list, can I please ask that you
review
it and update it as soon as possible please? His addresses in 89/8
and 83/8
work just fine, hence this presumption of BOGON filtering.
Matthew Walster
|
|
|
