Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: ISP customer assignments

  • From: Michael Thomas
  • Date: Mon Oct 05 19:50:42 2009

On 10/05/2009 04:41 PM, Robert.E.VanOrmer@frb.gov wrote:
The address space is daunting in scale as you have noted, but I don't see
any lessons learned in address allocation between IPv6 and IPv4.  Consider
as a residential customer, I will be provided a /64, which means each
individual on Earth will have roughly 1 billion addresses each.
Organizations will be provided /48s or smaller, but given the current
issues with routing /48's globally, I think you will find more
organizations fighting for /32s or smaller...  so what once was a
astonomical number of addresses that one cannot concieve numerically, soon
becomes much smaller.  I can see an IPv7 in the future, and doing it all
over again... I just hope I retire before it comes... The only difference
I can see between IPv4 and IPv6 is how much of a pain it is to type a 128
bit address...  Just like back in the day when Class B networks were
handed out like candy, one day we will be figuring out how to put in
emergency allocations on the ARIN listserv for IPv6 because of address
exhaustion and waste.
I'm perplexed. At what size address would people stop worrying about
the "finite" address space? 256 bits? 1024 bits?

I just don't get it. It's not like people get stressed out about running
out of name space in English which is probably more "finite" than ipv6.

Mike





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.