Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: ISP customer assignments

  • From: William Herrin
  • Date: Mon Oct 05 12:58:32 2009

On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Brian Johnson <bjohnson@drtel.com> wrote:
> From what I can tell from an ISP perspective, the design of IPv6 is for
> assignment of a /64 to an end user. Is this correct? Is this how it is
> currently being done? If not, where am I going wrong?

No. A /64 is one *subnet*. Essentially the standard, static size for
any Ethernet LAN. For a customer, the following values are more
appropriate:

/128 - connecting exactly one computer. Probably only useful for your
dynamic dialup customers. Any always-on or static-IP customer should
probably have a CIDR block.

/48 - current ARIN/IETF recommendation for a downstream customer
connecting more than one computer unless that customer is large enough
to need more than 65k LANs.

/56 - in some folks opinion, slightly more sane than assigning a 65k
subnets and bazillions of addresses to a home hobbyist with half a
dozen PC's.

/60 - the smallest amount you should allocate to a downstream customer
with more than one computer. Anything smaller will cost you extra
management overhead from not matching the nibble boundary for RDNS
delegation, handling multiple routes when the customer grows, not
matching the standard /64 subnet size and a myriad other obscure
issues.

Regards,
Bill Herrin


-- 
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com  bill@herrin.us
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.