North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: SMS
- From: Scott Berkman
- Date: Tue Sep 22 13:03:12 2009
FYI here is one view of one of the threads I was recalling:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/104612?search_string=sms;#
104612
Make sure to look at post #5 that summarized a previous thread too.
I think the "direct connection" I was thinking of was the modem to TAP
gateway options.
-Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: wherrin@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:wherrin@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of William
Herrin
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 12:29 PM
To: Scott Berkman
Cc: nanog@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: SMS
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:59 AM, Scott Berkman <scott@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Some people use a serial interface to a specific model cell phones to
> directly send the message over the carrier's cellular network. This is
good
> in the event of isolation of a location from any IP connectivity to a
> carrier gateway.
The Multitech Multimodem GPRS model MTCBA-G-EN-F4 has an ethernet
port. Add a SIM card from your favorite wireless carrier and you can
send and receive SMS messages via "AT" commands over a TCP socket.
Problem is, it seizes up or otherwise founders every few weeks and has
to be power cycled.
Has anyone heard of other products with a good reliability record?
> I believe there was another solution that involved direct carrier
> connections, but these are most likely cost prohibitive in most
situations.
Any pointers on this would be greatly appreciated. I have a need for
geographically redundant access to the same phone numbers in order to
send and receive SMS messages. Even if I have to buy a pair of T1s
that are 99.9% idle, it'd be worth it.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin ................ herrin@xxxxxxxxxxxx bill@xxxxxxxxx
3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
|
