North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Any help for Yahoo! Mail arrogance?
- From: Martin Hannigan
- Date: Mon Oct 29 22:24:34 2007
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=/ojEQamU9W/7Fs94Cyy2N7YGNLV+uk5Pomc7WOUNQDE=; b=ujIJwzvuo6oJlRGsPEe7epX4oEPclfyDE1lhLRIP0NynEaFZR684NVvmhYb5wgVD3xBNP6BLnF5g9sR+iOWOjO5lFUuOwAnYV2Jx3zlVTvOQ4mmRgZf2qwafVi9BmdLz63IV7KAgUdw8ex8GN28a9IculEbUodKCWMzyznn2HF8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PdiuuO/A/qIDhz5VrfYXUtlrnqQBAjjrkcoqM4/H3hdYqxvNu8Os9dUGzmSn2Sp7LKADAMgkG+3xCfm7rUlDe/NDJj2YAvIRcV0YgcOW6sszt9a8UsUDbuQki7qAOI+gIl3kZqHveYT2qGup2LcP5aJFmjLkmvcSldbSquWi5JE=
On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <ml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 10/29/07, Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET <ml@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > "Unfortunately, we cannot provide you with
> > > specific information other than to suggest a review
> > > of the questionnaire we supplied and try to determine
> > > where your mailing practices may be improved upon."
> >
> > In other words, fix your forwarding a lot better (and possibly
> > segregate it from your main mail stream, clearly label the forwarding
> > IP as a forwarder, etc)
> >
> > Yahoo arent really in the business of teaching people how to do a
> > better job. If that sounds like arrogance ..
> >
> > srs
> >
> "Fix your forwarding a lot better". Not sure what this
> means. My machines are MX's for the clients domain.
What are the addresses of the machines?
-M<
|
