North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: An informal survey... round II
- From: William Herrin
- Date: Thu Aug 30 09:19:35 2007
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=K+hyNbh4DjYzpx38IitGyqhauo2wMmVrxG+2jWsn3blK2lgqGentiqjXSBQCKxV0wZLgR5K4bEyNwmEsbmv/EGaon+83bGNXQxY4hfIwWHfDK7SKIWjE4mFvNHbpU+fG4DaFiEGPKCKvuRHsMaVHEKdqYViNShIQqrD2GXpm25k=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=WBdWi4wGdb/nxJCVW9Fyfl+y0qOjZv57lpYtlh01wyM71Pp+GXj2RXbMFUWyqg+cKUBvfOvvNdYYuyLtensp1mcaszaDB5IK8Z1jyjLEQiceLP6QRG90UjYy6MXty2Swu9P/4RccszpKKt5Pegs0EuTdz0mFrt+440AKwwYuGyM=
On 8/30/07, John Curran <jcurran@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I.E. If at some time unknown around 2010, ISP's stop receiving
> new allocations from their RIR, and instead use of many smaller
> "recycled" IPv4 address blocks, we could be looking at a 10x to
> 20x increase in routes per month for the same customer growth.
John,
Why should we announce tiny recycled blocks? If there is a /16 in the
swamp in which half the space is free but its all /24's, why wouldn't
wouldn't we allocate all the free /24's to a single entity and
instruct the entity to announce it as a "holey" /16? The existing /24
holders will override (punch holes in) the /16 for their /24's.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William D. Herrin herrin@xxxxxxxxxxxx bill@xxxxxxxxx
3005 Crane Dr. Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/>
Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
|
