
|
North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.
- From: Donald Stahl
- Date: Tue Aug 28 20:59:09 2007
agree that this isn't "ideal", however Cisco has always been very specific
about the h/w FIB & adjacency table sizes on the hardware in question.
i know that vendor bashing is a sport in this list, but....
Can you please point out where I can find this information ...
The only place I found information on the PFC3B was on a random page
for the SUP 720-3B. I was completely unable to find the information on a
Sup32 page.
Now maybe my search technique isn't up to snuff- but I would hope I could
find this information after searching for a couple of hours- I couldn't.
I'm sure the information is on Cisco's site somewhere- but I honestly
think that they could be a LOT more forward about it- rather then just
very specific about it.
-Don
- References:
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Brandon Butterworth
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Deepak Jain
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Florian Weimer
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Deepak Jain
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Eric Gauthier
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Jon Lewis
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Deepak Jain
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. William Herrin
- Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Eric Gauthier
- RE: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey. Lincoln Dale
|
|
|