North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: "2M today, 10M with no change in technology"? An informal survey.
- From: John A. Kilpatrick
- Date: Tue Aug 28 01:41:12 2007
On 8/27/07 9:39 PM, "Donald Stahl" <don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thankfully I don't need to take a full table on these routers and their
> forwarding speed among the few ports I have is more important than the FIB
> size. That said- if I did need the full table I would be royally ticked
> off at Cisco right now.
Well the way I'm putting it to my Cisco rep is "Why should I invest in 3BXLs
instead of another vendor's solution?" I'm saying this repeatedly. Maybe
they'll get the hint.
I won't throw away the 7604s...I could totally redeploy them in my corporate
infrastructure. At this point they really are Cat 6500s. I don't mind if
they make a 7600-only train as long as the 7600s can still run 6500 code
then at least it makes them useful. Just not as edge routers. I bet
Juniper is lulzing this hardcore.
--
John A. Kilpatrick
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Email| http://www.hypergeek.net/
john-page@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Text pages| ICQ: 19147504
remember: no obstacles/only challenges
|
