North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names
- From: Roland Dobbins
- Date: Sat Mar 31 20:48:58 2007
- Authentication-results: sj-dkim-8; header.From=rdobbins@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com/sjdkim8002 verified; );
- Dkim-signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=857; t=1175388160; x=1176252160; c=relaxed/simple; s=sjdkim8002; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=rdobbins@cisco.com; z=From:=20Roland=20Dobbins=20<rdobbins@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20On-going=20Internet=20Emergency=20and=20Domain=20Name s |Sender:=20; bh=53kohBXRpScEkuzlpH51e+ZzUfWiKXOC+AZUTnKDhB4=; b=k7aesKv1ajxGvL/+yxwmfO2Mz71NyiSh0tt+UtW6LW4MVDpeXATF4T51/agnZQW3pKpGrAo9 BtojpcfFmi+vZisnkI4bibNeHYC2aXlnRYfovvvrAtt5BsEE/DRssAhI;
On Apr 1, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Fergie wrote:
Care to expand?
Well, one reads about a) overly broad DMCA claims and b) overly broad
DMCA takedowns (oftentimes with no direct causation between the two),
and then a counterclaim process which seems to be somewhat ad hoc in
nature, often inefficient, and sometimes ineffective.
I'm wondering if there are any lessons, positive or negative, to be
drawn from the DMCA experience which may be relevant when discussing
the desirability/efficacy/workability/potential for abuse/possible
collateral damage/legal liabilities of a domain takedown regime?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Dobbins <rdobbins@xxxxxxxxx> // 408.527.6376 voice
Words that come from a machine have no soul.
-- Duong Van Ngo
|
