North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: On-going Internet Emergency and Domain Names
- From: Fergie
- Date: Sat Mar 31 19:56:08 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
- -- Douglas Otis <dotis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 16:47 -0500, Frank Bulk wrote:
>> For some operations or situations 24 hours would be too long a time to
>> wait. There would need to be some mechanism where the delay could be
>> bypassed.
>
>What operation requires a new domain be published within 24 hours? Even
>banks require several days before honoring checks as protection against
>fraud. A slight delay allows preemptive enforcement measures. It seems
>most if not all operations could factor in this delay into their
planning.
>
Doug and I completely agree on this issue.
So again, I ask: When does a policy breakdown become an operational
issue?
I would posit that it does when criminals are able to abuse the
system.
Would love to arguments to the contrary.
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.6.0 (Build 214)
wj8DBQFGDvB3q1pz9mNUZTMRAo1VAJ9rOisFN1xm4PjJsqUOeuSIWjy+OwCgpLQm
gU76B10LtNBWYrE9/JjiQ+U=
=vxKU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
fergdawg(at)netzero.net
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
|
