North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Reciprocal billing by independent LECs
- From: Ashe Canvar
- Date: Tue Oct 31 15:10:18 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=ZBSVDX8tpDmsBIEY4kKGzZ32KxB5fsWG2ZBU3KwEpBcewxo2YRI/8iLyMjOTow5SKWRigxf73XqV5h/TJarH71gZlA5ChKXJcJE8lNlQouUEzOyDo1L9NdZ5HQDZKaBN8++IklZvkzn3oVxphdjCdwC6uG3jdo8AYV5C4vu2gFM=
Hi all,
I am investigatng the reciprocal compensation model in use today
between the ILECs and some independents. Specifically, many companies
are offering multi party conferencing for free as a side effect of of
this reciprocity fee.
Seems like there were some disputes about it in the past :
http://telephonyonline.com/mag/telecom_draining_incumbent_us/
So is this still a valid business model or is a crackdown by the ILECs
in the cards ?
All info appreciated.
Thanks,
Ashe Canvar.
|
