North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: [Fwd: RE: Kremen VS Arin Antitrust Lawsuit - Anyone have feedback?]
- From: Justin M. Streiner
- Date: Mon Sep 11 14:26:22 2006
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, Chris Jester wrote:
IP addresses appear to be property - - read http://news.findlaw.com/
hdocs/docs/cyberlaw/kremencohen72503opn.pdf. Given that domain names
are property, IP addresses should be property, especially in
California where are constitution states "All things of value are
Intrinsic or non-intrinsic value? It's an important distinction.
I worked for a large-ish ISP for over seven years and made multiple
requests for IP space from ARIN in that time. My experience with this was
not at all bad. I did not find it to be like pulling teeth to get the
space. As long as the request documentation is in order, it was not too
Also, what about ARINS hardcore attitude making it near impossible
to aquire ip space, even when you justify it's use? I have had
nightmares myself as well as MANY of my collegues share similar experiences.
I am having an issue right now with a UNIVERSITY in Mexico tryin to get
ip's from the mexican counterpart.
I disagree with the notion that IP addresses are property.