North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Interesting new spam technique - getting a lot more popular.
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Wed Jun 14 00:16:49 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=o/JgTRkGOEzrAZsYMMZC37SYm9xI1lSPOX1HZsKsTRtfDkMyLsvwuXYAP7A6+w8cyZ2SyAahcvzrT00LsKJ34aWp5SRXA3iCMb54Rl4eS7Vw9FeJ9uROqysNBTFsy3HaOAgknRgHgZXvTGz13nKyK1f8oSrysd+rzt/d14e001g=
That was not my advice btw - just forwarding on what I saw.
What you say does seem like a "must do" all right - but putting ARP
filters in is actually a reasonable idea.
On 6/14/06, Christopher L. Morrow
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> * Monitor your local network for interfaces transmitting ARP
> responses they shouldn't be.
how about just mac security on switch ports? limit the number of mac's at
each port to 1 or some number 'valid' ?
Suresh Ramasubramanian (email@example.com)