Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism

  • From: Alexei Roudnev
  • Date: Wed Apr 12 04:18:47 2006

Hmm, if some idiot wrote my NTP IP into his hardware, I just stop to monitor
my NTP and make sure that it have few hours of error in time. No one require
me to CLAIM that I set up wrong time, BUT no one can require me to maintain
correct time just because some idiots use my server.

The same in this case - instead of long claiming, complaining and so on they
could just set up wrong time (and never claim that they did it - just _oo,
we have a wrong time.. Thanks, but we do not maintain this NTP server and we
cannot change anything on this server so we cannot correct it_ - and problem
could be solved forever. And even could maintain different NTP translation
fro their customers. Just again, no one can prohibit it, even in USA. Just
_DO NOT CLAIM_ that it was intentionally.

Here is a difference  - _coffee is hot, someone's server is brokn, if
'Ivan||Paul||Lisa' have a CD he/she always can make a copy,
fire can burn, dog can bite_ - everyone should know it; if he do not know,
it's his personal problems, not someone's liability. Kids MUST learn such
things when they are young. It is COMMON SENSE.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law" <froomkin@law.miami.edu>
To: "Alexei Roudnev" <alex@relcom.net>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>; "John Dupuy" <jdupuy-list@socket.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: Open Letter to D-Link about their NTP vandalism


> <law professor> I'd really suggest that readers confirm this claim (that
> intentional sending of false data with a malicious purpose is perfectly
> acceptable) with a local lawyer before trying it at home or at work.</law
> professor>
>
> I also bet that the claim of widespread acceptability would fail badly if
> we weigh countries by population.  Or even connectivity.
>
> Not to mention the fact that your packets might stray across borders
> sometimes.
>
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Alexei Roudnev wrote:
>
> >
> > It's legal to have broken NTP server in ANY country, and it's legal in
most
> > (by number) countries to send counter-attack (except USA as usual, where
> > lawyers want to get their money and so do not allow people to
self-defence).
> >
>
> -- 
> http://www.icannwatch.org   Personal Blog: http://www.discourse.net
> A. Michael Froomkin   |    Professor of Law    |   froomkin@law.tm
> U. Miami School of Law, P.O. Box 248087, Coral Gables, FL 33124 USA
> +1 (305) 284-4285  |  +1 (305) 284-6506 (fax)  |  http://www.law.tm
>                         -->It's warm here.<--





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.