North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: shim6 @ NANOG (forwarded note from John Payne)
- From: Alexei Roudnev
- Date: Tue Mar 07 02:52:17 2006
>
> Thus spake <Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com>
> > Let's face it, IPv6 is close enough to IPv4 that any
> > attempt to put a price on IPv4 addresses will simply
> > cause a massive migration to free and plentiful IPv6
> > addresses.
>
> You assume that there will be a source of free and plentiful IPv6
addresses.
Why not? It is CORE idea of IPcv6 addres space (no matter whart is written
abouyt allocation policies).
And I can bet, we will see how every business can get PI space when required
(in ipv6) for multi home,
in less than 3 - 4 years.
Except if IPv6 will be replaced by something simpler and more reliable like
IPv8 (but it looks very unlikely now).
|
