North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Disaster recovery using as-prepend?
- From: Christopher J. Pilkington
- Date: Thu Feb 16 09:58:08 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=l8MLE5iYG8XCCNnUFaHzSgJJb7ohACFlHPEtSwmOOVidRWwzwfctbFIhfu9XiXZG3KkGoXBjR5NX8/+KtgDGGc9xu65yRAa/Nq9XDeROZnOcnEWU4R699BQj5rGHvbcb86gW+dNUDvCgDHh31ICe+QeQs+3g9pXk5DbaLv4mJDY=
My apologies if this question doesn't belong here.
We have a PI /24 we'd like to advertise out of our primary data center
for production use. (Well, actually, we'll be advertising a more
specific from our /21 assignment, so already not too friendly... but I
digress.)
We have a disaster recovery site which will have a clone of the myriad
production servers. We'd like to fail over to that site
automagically.
I'm thinking advertising the same prefix and just doing several
as-prepends. However, now I'm not sure if this is a polite thing to
do or not.
Someone mentioned to me something with MEDs, but as soon as that term
was used, I started twitching, and couldn't follow the conversation.
Would a "good netizen" use the as-prepend method? Or am I missing a
simpler/more polite solution?
-Christopher
|
