North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: a radical proposal (Re: protocols that don't meet the need...)
- From: Andre Oppermann
- Date: Wed Feb 15 16:23:11 2006
Edward B. DREGER wrote:
PJ> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:46:33 +0000 (GMT)
PJ> From: Paul Jakma
PJ> Well you don't need to assign an ASN for Cox and SBC to announce a shared
PJ> prefix for a start off.
Technically true, but administratively not feasible. Coordinating
private ASNs would be similar to coordining RFC1918 space between
different entities, although it's definitely a nice goal.
I'd say you already fail at coordinating Cox and SBC before any link
is up and prefixes get announced. I bet they can't even agree on which
of them writes the prefix and ASN application to ARIN.
$realworld always wins.
--
Andre
|
