North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: SPAM Level Status - And why not stop the peering with lame ISPs
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Thu Feb 09 23:27:47 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HD/0CATK7r8fsA5jjOsK1vPr4QsNSvkY/bhl4OPqiHeK8yWIuhzB6dy9L3fn8nxFCGA3Hvbex5Yfj4ftetqyUUSOP4c/0HJ8D0O7TmNI8P62a4VQUNDuRZStKX24UCkCz94NT0K43ks+aaQavUlq8AVbCVdZFuf1Ux3hClgViAo=
On 2/10/06, Alain Hebert <ahebert@pubnix.net> wrote:
>
> Its the other 20% which is buggin the hell of our clients...
> (Mostly New spam format and the dynamic spam with generated images)
>
Try a few of the cheaper tricks - HELO checks, for example, or
greetpause (I'd say graylisting but that has interesting consequences
when it comes up against another "cool antispam trick" - sender
address callbacks).
They'll cut down on a ton of this stuff. AUPs etc are good but
believing in the "be generous in what you accept" part of that old saw
never got you anywhere... though a certain amount of generosity is
called for all right.
> Most ARIN ISP's also take it somewhat seriously (legal issues and
> such)... Except for those big ones, big lawyers thrump reality/truth
> anytime.
Asiapac ISPs have a rather worse problem but well - theyre not the only ones.
Like I said try maawg - the next one is later this month in SFO - www.maawg.org
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
|
