North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: is this like a peering war somehow?
- From: Alexander Harrowell
- Date: Fri Jan 20 07:11:56 2006
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=afb638ewzXPlJmUMqj19qTtRArw6Hpb9cFSe/kaGaWIa1AFPPbHbPoKO/BWg+BmyuW7oIkHHlA8taK0EyAZFY7iijWV6JVjjOroYHdxCGiPo4bsrRGuvS2LhRlGvDqQb1Jb8MqErmVk7CgNKJWpk8CTOvH9NA44XZQajrCh7G0I=
Whatever. No-one's actually trying to do "some packets are more equal
than others" here in Europe, except for the mobile people with IMS and
such. BT just transferred its access network into a new division with
a specific remit to provide open access to all ISPs and alt-
tels who want it.
It's in the US that the RBOCs and cablesters are actually doing this.
On 1/20/06, Per Heldal <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 23:44:59 +0000, "Paul Vixie" <email@example.com> said:
> > proving once again that "peering ratios" only matter if the other guy's
> > customers can live without your "assymetric" content, here are two
> > articles
> > i saw today via slashdot. what's interesting to me is whether bellsouth
> > will be sued some time later by some other content provider for
> > de-peering
> > them without also having applied the same rules to google. note, this
> > isn't
> > a bellsouth-specific rant, they just happen to be mentioned in today's
> > story.
> Carriers trying to charge content-providers for access to their
> network/customers is just part of a greater picture. The telco industry
> is fighting to re-establish their dominant position. Traditionally
> they've been able to pocket (extort) a large portion of the revenue for
> 3rd-party PSTN services (content services) themselves. Over the last
> decade they've gained control of the ISP-industry and noe they want to
> achieve the same level of control of the internet. The most conservative
> are even suggesting to remove internet-governance from the public
> domain. The European telecoms industry is openly urging the UN to take
> control of ICANN's role. In the process they are trying to place the
> functions of IANA and IETF in their belowed ITU. Their ultimate goal is
> to eliminate IP as a product, to be able to sell access to sub-protocols
> as individual services.
> Per Heldal