North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?
- From: Hannigan, Martin
- Date: Mon Dec 26 00:25:55 2005
Title: Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?
Yes, I agree. As usual, I too am 'IANAL'.
From: Steven M. Bellovin [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Sun Dec 25 23:52:27 2005
To: Hannigan, Martin
Cc: Dave Pooser; NANOG
Subject: Re: Compromised machines liable for damage?
In message <80632326218FE74899BDD48BB836421A033001@Dul1wnexmb04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.c
om>, "Hannigan, Martin" writes:
>Dave, RIAA wins almost 100pct vs p2p'ers ir sues. Its an interesting =
"Wins" is too strong a word, since I don't think any have gone to
court -- see http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/arts/AP-Music-Download-Suit.html
as my source.
Besides, it's a very different situation. For my take on liability
issues -- note that I'm not a lawyer, and note that this is from 1994
-- see http://www.wilyhacker.com/1e/chap12.pdf
--Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb