North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
#nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down
- From: Albert Meyer
- Date: Wed Dec 21 15:31:57 2005
I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I looked
around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind channels to
organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the channel
to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good idea?
Andrew Kirch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
william(at)elan.net wrote:
I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog
|