North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Clueless anti-virus products/vendors (was Re: Sober)
- From: Niels Bakker
- Date: Thu Dec 08 06:29:46 2005
* Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com (Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com) [Thu 08 Dec 2005, 12:11 CET]:
The RFC process itself is broken when clueless vendors treat RFCs as
inviolable specs and implement according to the RFC even when they find
flaws in it. If they want to remain true to the RFC process, they should
not implement dumb things found in an RFC, instead they should write and
submit a new RFC correcting the error and explaining the right way to do
Exactly. The nice thing about standards is that there are so many to
choose from! Why not add a few more?
"Calling religion a drug is an insult to drugs everywhere.
Religion is more like the placebo of the masses."
-- MeFi user boaz