North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
RE: QoS for ADSL customers
- From: Scott Morris
- Date: Thu Dec 01 08:58:42 2005
There was a 3.0 PDLM release on 11/1/05 for Bittorrent traffic. See
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] On Behalf Of Ejay
Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 8:41 AM
To: 'Kim Onnel'
Subject: RE: QoS for ADSL customers
I got an off-list reply about using Nbar, but I've never seen a class map
that would match torrent.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Behalf Of Kim Onnel
> Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 7:12 AM
> To: Ejay Hire
> Cc: NANGO
> Subject: Re: QoS for ADSL customers
> Our ADSL customers traffic is 3 OC3 worth of traffic, I
> think our management would buy the idea.
> On 12/1/05, Ejay Hire <email@example.com> wrote:
> Going back to your original question, how to keep
> saturating the network with residential users using
> bittorrent/edonkey et al, while suffocating business
> customers. Here goes.
> Netfilter/IpTables (and a slew of commercial
> sure) has a Layer 7 traffic classifier, meaning it
> identify specific file transfer applications and set
> DiffServ bit. This means it can tell between a real
> request and a edonkey transfer, even if they are
> http. It also has rate-limiting capability. So...
> pass all of the traffic destined for your DSL
> through an iptables box (single point of failure)
> can classify and rate-limit the downstream rate on a
> per-application basis.
> Fwiw, if you are using diffserv bits, you could push
> rate-limits down to the router with a qos policy in
> instead of doing it all in the iptables box.
> References on this.. The netfilter website (for
> classification info) and the Linux advanced router
> (LART) (qos info/rate limiting)
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: firstname.lastname@example.org
> > Behalf Of Kim Onnel
> > Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 3:26 AM
> > To: NANGO
> > Subject: Re: QoS for ADSL customers
> > Can any one please suggest to me any commercial or
> > solution to cap the download stream traffic, our
> > will not recieve marked traffic from us, so what
> done ?
> > On 11/29/05, Kim Onnel <email@example.com>
> > Hello everyone,
> > We have Juniper ERX as BRAS for ADSL, its
> > interface is on an old Cisco 3508 switch with an
> > gateway to the internet is a 7609, our transit
> > terminate on GigaE, Flexwan on the 7600
> > The links are now almost always fully
> > to do some QoS to cap our ADSL downstream, to give
> > the Corp. customers traffic to flow without pain.
> > I'm here to collect ideas, comments, advises
> > experiences for such situations.
> > Our humble approach was to collect some p2p
> > police traffic to these ports, but the traffic
> > one other thing is rate-limiting per ADSL
> > that wasnt supported by management, so we thought
> > ADSL www traffic and doing exceed action is
> > police other IP traffic.
> > Doing so on the ERX wasnt a nice experience,
> > trying to do it on the cisco.
> > Thanks