North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies
- From: David Barak
- Date: Tue Nov 29 09:32:06 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Xd8wPSsrm5XIn21l5RUQJ2ajLbyDxsjSDev/9ASc0mgtfPqU+GTdc3c2ppBHIkrNh/RCiLdCTqfxh2AwjthwZPXeWXGpkBYEdMYRTh2PZlwu+M+RDbEL/mXDgJaqqxw9TcC7bY5NuZLnvLn7zevowLxjz8B0mIK+AqJVHgueuAA= ;
--- Richard A Steenbergen <ras@e-gerbil.net> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2005 at 10:21:53AM +0000,
> Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com wrote:
> >
> > It's hard to imagine an organization who can
> afford to run
> > a network using BGP to announce a class C block
> and not
> > be able to afford $1250 per year.
>
> Sounds like a failure of imagination to me.
The statement Michael forgot was "using PI space" -
lots of "Bob's bait & tackle shop" types of operations
use BGP to announce a /24 to two providers. I have
yet to find an organization which is concerned about
getting new PI space which would have a problem paying
that amount per year. They may exist, but they're
certainly not the majority of the groups looking for
PI IP.
David Barak
Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise:
http://www.listentothefranchise.com
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com
|
