North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: BGP Security and PKI Hierarchies (was: Re: Wifi Security)
- From: George Michaelson
- Date: Wed Nov 23 21:01:55 2005
On Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:54:44 -0800 (PST)
"william(at)elan.net" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2005, George Michaelson wrote:
> > According to what I understand, there have to be two certificates
> > per entity:
> > one is the CA-bit enabled certificate, used to sign
> > subsidiary certificates about resources being given to other people
> > to use.
> > the other is a self-signed NON-CA certificate, used to sign
> > route assertions you are attesting to yourself: you make
> > this cert using the CA cert you get from your logical parent.
> So how is the 2nd one different from the first?
the important distinction is that the certificate used to sign resource
assertions doesn't have the CA bit set.