North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: Cogent move without renumbering
- From: Charles Cala
- Date: Fri Oct 07 17:17:27 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=G8inv3rfrwFkkoIRoQpWSIsI/gH20BBkzFpBBPNMjQ4of1Pk7i8Br1q0HZTQcChPS7A5FgQ/bMbaupw7b6LjFX84PdW5KkN+tBcNO64y0kV7EjdBbIaWyqgyB46x9p3hJM4esONLcHK9tbtuxO9TGEnqVomnTKuOsTlarUZ+Odc= ;
(if i may shorten this a bit...)
Q can an "end user" take non portable ip's with them
to another service provider?
--- "william(at)elan.net" <william@elan.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
> Depending upon the circumstance, yes:
here is SOME of the raw data
http://e-gerbil.net/ras/nac-case/
SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
DOCKET NO. MRS-C-87-04
JUNE 25, 2004
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Civil Action No. 04-cv-2831
June 24, 2004
perhaps folowups should be set to
A.S.H.K
|
