North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: [fergie-spew] RE: FW: Crews Survey Rita's Damages
- From: Fergie (Paul Ferguson)
- Date: Sun Sep 25 22:26:32 2005
I take issue with what you folks think is relative.
It's _clearly_ unbalanced, unfair, and biased.
I'm in the process of turning back up a major portion of the
state network over the next couple of days hete in texas, and
reports of network status is somehow not on-topic?
I'm thinking that NANOG is just completely FUBAR'd...
You guys can have your boys club.
As for the rest of the readership, I'm Sorry you are ending up
with a mailing list that is ruled by a select few, who have decided
that they wish to control the content of "operations".
What a damned shame.
-- Randy Bush <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
begging the point of whether news about telco, not internet,
circuits and wireless is ot for nanog, i think all martin was
asking is a subject: tag for for your news posts, as he seems
to have a brain-dead mua (which is highly popular for some
reason) with very limited filtering capabilities. i don't
think he meant it as a personal attack; i assume you would know
one if he did:-).
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
Engineering Architecture for the Internet
email@example.com or firstname.lastname@example.org
ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/