North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: image stream routers
- From: tony sarendal
- Date: Sat Sep 17 13:39:13 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=qt+wtoCX/CTK0FfsieWPsF5lfkGMmveeALgQUITkXvQIgrOdPGSwv6uX7Ui+xNLVPzBGdL0OXKBl1+Oqj00mFZs9tpjRqlY5FVGqVUm3DkX+Mpzb7XulG1AGPrDq4lD0580OUGcohZxTHAXGa2lL5g9s/jkMyWZ7yxMi5q1LY4k=
On 17/09/05, sthaug@nethelp.no <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote:
> > A collegue smartbits tested a 1GHz pc, with a full feed and 250k
> > simoultaneons flows it managed around 250kpps. This also with freebsd
> > and device polling. It sounds to me like a software based machine can
> > be plenty fast with good code under the hood.
>
> Sorry, in today's world of high-end routers 250kpps doesn't qualify as
> "plenty fast". Can your box do linerate Gigabit Ethernet with minimum
> size packets, on several ports simultaneously?
>
I didn't say that a 250kpps box was a high-end box.
One reliable Mpps is not high-end either, but it can carry quite a lot
of Mbps. What is C or M price for a reliable full feed Mpps ?
"My" high-end boxes never manage to impress me with their pps
capability before I'm disapointed in their reliability.
/Tony
--
Tony Sarendal - dualcyclone@gmail.com
IP/Unix
-= The scorpion replied,
"I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-
|
