Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: image stream routers

  • From: tony sarendal
  • Date: Sat Sep 17 12:35:57 2005
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S5B1KFCfsFTqVhqtWgzsig/Nyr0EG9b38YPOEbRirL0LFBxh045Qc1Yt8YswBlofF0O/+NwqiXG01NCxcUDWqgJDCnm8Lz98QLkAtqzTZV/yDC1j2GIfqe2IPyDo3ui42735hRPEv9PF6jlRQThIpG7JQhD12FMRib2B8Yea0o4=

On 17/09/05, Lincoln Dale <ltd@interlink.com.au> wrote:
> 
> Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> > I'd be interested to know the relative pros and cons of switching packets in
> > software (Imagestream) versus handing them off to a dedicated ASIC (Cisco,
> > Juniper)
> 
> [without having looked at Imagestream in any way, shape or form..]
> 
> it would be _unlikely_ that any router vendor that wants to support >OC3
> could do so with the 'standard' (non-modified) linux IP stack.  if they
> are modifying the 'standard' linux IP stack then its very unlikely that
> one could do so without having to publish the source-code to it.  (i.e.
> as per GPL).
> 
> 'standard' linux on standard hardware isn't capable of much more than
> 100K PPS.  sure - some folks have a few hundred packets/sec - but these
> are minimalist versus the demonstrated performance of ASIC-based
> forwarding, typically 30M-50M PPS.
> 

Regarding software based forwarding and pps old docs from the FreeBSD
guys claim that the 1Mpps barrier can be broken on a 2.8GHz XEON, with
todays standards a mediocer pc.

http://people.freebsd.org/~andre/FreeBSD-5.3-Networking.pdf 

A collegue smartbits tested a 1GHz pc, with a full feed and 250k
simoultaneons flows it managed around 250kpps. This also with freebsd
and device polling. It sounds to me like a software based machine can
be plenty fast with good code under the hood.

/Tony

-- 
Tony Sarendal - dualcyclone@gmail.com
IP/Unix
       -= The scorpion replied,
               "I couldn't help it, it's my nature" =-




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.