North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Buh bye
- From: Randy Bush
- Date: Tue Sep 06 20:19:41 2005
> From: "Jay R. Ashworth" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Buh bye
> Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 15:24:48 -0400
>> I'm about to be removed, forcibly, from nanog-post.
thanks for reposting. of course, i have jay procmailed
> It doesn't matter what it's for, I thought there was a "no
> censorship" agreement in the "new" NANOG. We can procmail.
> Did I miss something?
as i was not at the lost wages or seattle meetings, i can
o i am sure the ml committee thinks they are acting in the
best interests of nanog, process, ....
o i am sure others will think otherwise. welcome to a world
of funny monkeys and network operators in particular :-)
o could we discuss this over on nanog-futures, where we are
trying to direct meta-discussions?
o by that, i do NOT at all mean to shut down discussion. in
fact, the opposite. as many know, i have strong feelings
on this particular issue, which i try to keep separate
from my sc hat.
o but we do need to leave this list clear for fergie's 20
postings a day on what's happening in austin, the url of
some cartoon, what you can read in the ny times, and so
o and, as you can see from the sc minutes , we plan to
have an open sc meeting in los angeles where we hope that
this and any other issues of general concern will be
raised and discussed.
 - <http://www.nanog.org/sc.minutes05.html>