North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Replacing PSTN with VoIP wise? Was Re: Phone networks struggle in Hurricane Katrina's wake
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Date: Wed Aug 31 06:59:05 2005
On 31-aug-2005, at 10:04, Mark Foster wrote:
I do see a risk in the move toward IP systems at the edge. At the
core is a different story to at least some degree.
There are two types of VoIP: voice over a private, tightly controlled
IP network, and voice over the public internet. Now obviously the
latter is a risky proposition, as it imports all the limitations of
the internet into the voice service. Apart from the fact that many
parts of the internet aren't all that robust (but some are), this is
a problem because voice and IP react differently to congestion
collapse, which invariably happens to some degree in big emergencies.
With IP, delays and packet loss build up, slowing everything down,
but allowing many protocols to continue to work at a reduced rate.
With PSTN, initiating calls starts failing more and more, but when
you get through, you generally get to talk because you get a reserved
piece of the scarce bandwidth. With VoIP, packet loss and delay
eventually make the service useless. So VoIP fails harder than either
traditional IP apps and PSTN.
Twas also pointed out that British Telecom are heading down the
same track as Telecom NZ, and their rollout should be completed
earlier. I trust therefore that it has all been thought out in
terms of robustness and the like.
However, voice over a private network isn't entirely trouble-free,
even though the private network can be designed such that congestion
is a less fatal problem. And it does have the advantage that it
allows IP routing protocols to route ongoing calls around failed
parts of the network. On the other hand, in a circuit switched
network you can do all kinds of interesting stuff (such as restarting
all your control software) without breaking your sessions. We're only
now seeing this in IP, and I think it's not really possible to reach
the same levels with IP routing even in the long run. And then there
is all this SIP stuff, which I'm (thankfully) only superficially
familiar with, but never seemed particular robust to me.
And voice over any kind of packet infrastructure introduces
significant additional delays.
I think in 10 years or so we'll realize that TDM isn't so bad after all.