North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: ISP's In Uproar Over Verizon-MCI Merger
- From: Chris Boyd
- Date: Wed Aug 24 02:22:37 2005
Apologies for this possibly off topic post, but it does touch on the
future speeds and feeds of networks. What follows is my opinion, not
employer's, etc, etc, etc.
On Aug 23, 2005, at 4:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
True. We've been through this in Texas recently. During our regular
legislative session, we successfully fought and killed a bill that
would have done much harm to local ISPs, regional WISPs operating in
partnership with a city, and POTS consumers. Problem is that the
cablecos and telcos came back with a somewhat under the table push
during a special session that was supposed to be devoted to school
funding only and passed a modified (read--written to benefit both
cablecos and telcos, instead of just telcos) bill. There's lots of
information from the opposition side at http://www.savemuniwireless.org/
does not take much convincing in dc that what is good for big business
is good for america these days.
For those outside the state or the US, Texas has some very odd
political traditions and laws that are beyond explanation in email.
On Aug 23, 2005, at 4:45 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
The US ranks somewhere around 10th to 14th, depending on the survey.
Yes, part of that is dues to our wide open spaces. I agree that it's
much more difficult and expensive to deploy broadband in US-style
suburbs vs. high density apartments. But there's also a speed gap.
I'm not sure that's the case, AFAIK the US holds its own.
On Aug 23, 2005, at 5:23 PM, Daniel Senie wrote:
I'm not opposed to local telco and cable companies being the only
players, IFF there's a "must serve" rule, same as there is for
local telco service. There are lots of towns that have no
broadband, and no chance of ever getting it unless there's a "must
serve" rule like there was for rural telephone service.
If we follow this course in the US, we'll be stuck with the minimum
speed that can be defined as broadband. A while back, I think that
was 128Kbits/sec as defined by the FCC.
So, if we're going to put Ma-bell back together, then let's do it
right and make last-mile broadband a required service just like the
telcos have to provide dialtone.
In the meantime, Japan, Korea, and the rest of the world are
deploying cheap, fast services. Yahoo BB offers 100Mbit/sec
residential service. Anyone in the US want to step up to that for
$40/month? Oh, and you get VoIP too. 1 gig service coming Real Soon
Yes, this will make a difference. Say what you like about the dot
com days, but it did change the world. Many of the companies that a
good chunk of people on this list work for were started in dorm rooms
with really fast always on connections. If we spread the college
dorm's ResNet across the globe, how will the world look in five more