Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think

[Joel Jaeggli]

On Thu, 4 Aug 2005, Scott Francis wrote:

> On 8/3/05, Robert E. Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com> wrote:
> > Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology
> > can be blended together to make one's code more secure?
> what unsupported assertions? The project's record speaks for itself.
> Don't confuse Theo's lack of social graces with a lack of polish on
> the project he leads (a common mistake).
You might bust out google and try and see what the oldest reference you 
can find to Robert Seastrom being associated with bsd development is...

Nanog-l is not someplace that we can rationally have a discussion of BSD 
internals or differing *BSD development/management styles.

--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Joel Jaeggli  	       Unix Consulting 	       joelja@darkwing.uoregon.edu
GPG Key Fingerprint:     5C6E 0104 BAF0 40B0 5BD3 C38B F000 35AB B67F 56B2