North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think
- From: Scott Francis
- Date: Thu Aug 04 23:05:30 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tHbSQYLNvHDiGrwKgpfwUkCHNrHaC7UibrKmyGhcx3iegXP3XMipVSHg/ir0jcDNgydAkqqOEjuBymEEtzNigL7/gzllvi6EpXpMJCcbKJXmEUFKKfOMw6k6JVVz/sNKXa0eQfqncHea3V5dDNH6A2htVCNhKrWG3GD2C7MzAK0=
On 8/3/05, Robert E. Seastrom <rs@seastrom.com> wrote:
>
>
> Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com writes:
>
> > We should all be looking to the security auditing work done by
> > the OpenBSD team for an example of how systems can be
> > cleaned up, fixed, and locked down if there is a will to do so.
>
> Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology
> can be blended together to make one's code more secure?
what unsupported assertions? The project's record speaks for itself.
Don't confuse Theo's lack of social graces with a lack of polish on
the project he leads (a common mistake).
--
darkuncle@{gmail.com,darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527
encrypted email to the latter address please
http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key
|
