North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
RE: NETGEAR in the core...
- From: Sam Crooks
- Date: Sun Jul 31 08:09:17 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:reply-to:from:to:subject:date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-mailer:in-reply-to:thread-index:x-mimeole:message-id; b=J4WaQtlMOZ3hvzYh9EbumoeGS6SaWMqRzVc/yJhtC/oTWemGm7u7hdkfiEfIAuO3kC0gKtbDAa6zCHnz7mxdrNEIEb3Ha5h4ZIYZOLeRlS6lDKNiUMMqCc9Ig2JRCJZGDUJHKxStT3sW36dMelS31FIyO0Nn+TmQL6NbD4pPkxU=
SCO Unix runs on cyberguards older than 6.0 (aka Classic)
Linux 2.6 kernel runs on the 6.0 (aka TSP) as for SG line... I don't
know...
At home I run WRT54g w/ a opensource firewall image loaded into it... it is
a little buggier than I'd risk my job on...I find CG's to be an enormous
PITA, better that Sonicwalls, but not a good as a Netscreen or PIX
YMMV
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of
Henry Yen
Sent: Saturday, July 30, 2005 8:33 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: NETGEAR in the core...
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 10:11:28AM -0400, Robert Boyle wrote:
> >I'm interested in people's experiences with consumer-grade routers
> >functioning in non-NAT mode; that is to say, running PPPoE to the ISP
> >and routing a /29 or a /28. A sane filtering language and stateful
> >firewall that can operate in non-NAT mode is a plus.
> http://www.cyberguard.com/products/firewall/SG_Family/
I think linux runs inside those. Vendor-supplied, yes, but if the OP
wants to avoid linux altogether...
No personal experience, but could a LinkSys/WRT45g with
custom linux load be even cheaper?
Can a cisco 1600 run PPPoE?
--
Henry Yen Aegis Information Systems,
Inc.
Senior Systems Programmer Hicksville, New York
|
