Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: ISP phishing

  • From: william(at)elan.net
  • Date: Wed Jun 29 12:19:53 2005


On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

On 29/06/05, william(at)elan.net <william@elan.net> wrote:
BTW - I happened to know person who has setup email forwarding for his
department in major university in st.louis on sparc2 12 years ago.
It is still working as far as I know! Last mail software update on it
I believe was made 5 or 6 years ago when open relaying was disabled.

We dont do sender rewriting / envelope rewriting for forwarded email,
just pass it on

We'll prepend Resent: headers though .. that should be enough
And that would like be against what is specified in RFC2822 as in
section 3.6.6 it says:

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Reintroducing a message into the transport system and using
resent fields is a different operation from "forwarding".
"Forwarding" has two meanings: One sense of forwarding is that a mail
reading program can be told by a user to forward a copy of a message
to another person, making the forwarded message the body of the new
message. A forwarded message in this sense does not appear to have
come from the original sender, but is an entirely new message from
the forwarder of the message.  On the other hand, forwarding is also
used to mean when a mail transport program gets a message and
forwards it on to a different destination for final delivery. Resent
header fields are not intended for use with either type of forwarding.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You really should not be using Resent- unless this is done from MUA
by direct manual action of the user - but use of Resent- by automated
MTA process is not ok.

But well, we run linux and postfix, and a reasonably recent (non
bleeding edge) version of both.  We're not running on sendmail 8.8.8
or whatever your university department friend was running, I assure
you
The point is that there are many systems setup all over the world and
people don't realize how many of those small intermediate systems are
out there that are not running recent mail software. And because for forwarding systems setup many do not need to do more then relay to
pre-defined address from aliases file or database, there is little need
to to keep system updated to latest standards and this creates a very
big problem as far as getting every forwarding system updated fast with
something like SRS.

--
William Leibzon
Elan Networks
william@elan.net




Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.