North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Thu Jun 23 10:59:08 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=i5Tz7x1zdi6XVNphz5mYItGqHaqpJqsXBedskr7Xs8Mol5WiYIXlppFVNzsPNnbVwbM94VYY3xN/HLB4bUAffUbOycJfL64Wq0pKJd7ylsV7FpU+bwduuy4jylQEoBCat7SZmzNWunMzL29WlAwoEYtUKdEwQ1t1tFRyY/oFJTs=
Wild idea and there's just too much good german beer here at MAAWG
(www.maawg.org) in Dusseldorf, but .. anybody tried anycasting a
mailserver?
Operationally that is ...
On 23/06/05, Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com <Michael.Dillon@btradianz.com> wrote:
>
> > You don't need a central MX if each site MTA knows which users are at
> > which sites. Incoming email may have to take an extra hop if it comes in
> > to the wrong site, but that's a consequence of the specification that no
> > implementation can fix.
>
> In other words, SMTP does not have the equivalent of an
> HTTP redirect which is what he wants here. Maybe SMTP
> really is broken? ;-)
>
> --Michael Dillon
>
--
Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists@gmail.com)
|
