North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Sender IDAuthentication......?]
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Date: Thu Jun 16 06:57:38 2005
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 11:32:31AM +0200,
email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote
a message of 21 lines which said:
> The number of agreements needed in the email world is significantly
> higher than what is needed for BGP.
The proponents of "email peering" typically want to switch from the
current model (millions of independant email servers) to a different
model, with only a few big actors.
"Should anyone be allowed to operate an email system? Perhaps not."