North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication......?
- From: Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Date: Wed Jun 08 23:10:14 2005
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Jv1FIz5Kt2y2rO2aREgg1g2xtCdPBEq3z4sSnqEdgk2+m8EzAbouIRfCAv+2ulnYkTLu2rTx8VVBW3TB7clQuoSuxwjnMNq3MuCq0LCjlblvYEOBWKHBT3S5FwM/e88HJ8x8pBfnMLZcWRZrOvItYXMtlHmuN1+ihJ446nZO8AY=
On 08/06/05, Tony Finch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I don't think the lack of standard APIs is a problem: it seems to me that
> the various MTA authors have been reasonably keen to support the various
> nascent specifications, especially if they have a reasonably good
> reference implementation library.
Easier for those of us who run multiple MTAs, especially large farms of them
But yes, you do have a point that it is not exactly a problem.
Is there something in the works for postfix and qmail yet?
Suresh Ramasubramanian (email@example.com)