I thought that loose-mode uRPF is what was recommended for any connected
entity that is multi-homed. And that makes sense.
On 2005-06-03, at 10:26, Andre Oppermann wrote:
I guess it's been a while since I've played with it, but isn't this
well what happens with uRPF anyhow?
No, my proposal works as long as the customer advertizes their prefixes
via BGP, not matter how long the path or what community attributes are
set (for example NOEXPORT). No matter how they send it, as long as they
send it, it works fine.
So, your proposal is loose-mode uRPF?