North American Network Operators Group|
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
- From: Joe Maimon
- Date: Fri Jun 03 16:51:45 2005
Pete Templin wrote:
This sounds like the better approach. Although this is still not
strictly what the customer want, because all peers of the same edge will
prefer the edges path.
This is new to me, but I haven't bought any new transit in the past 18
months -- is
this common practice on multihomed BGP customers now? I could force
things to work
by always advertising all my prefixes out to them with the obvious
living in fear of my outbound traffic being dropped if I ever need to
I (a network much, much smaller than Sprint) do uRPF on all ports, but
also inform BGP customers (nine-page handoff documentation) that they
are uRPFed. However, in conjunction with community support for
adjusting localpref, we set a sufficient weight on the announcement so
that the edge node sees the customer link as preferred even if the rest
of our network doesn't, and therefore the uRPF check passes.
I don't think advertising more-specifics through other connections would
actually work, as the Sprint edge router would still want to reach the
more-specifics through the Sprint network, rather than the customer
link. It's all a matter of what the FIB says.