Beginning June 01 2005
Messages: 630
Page 1 of 1
First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

The North American Network Operators Group (NANOG) provides a forum for the exchange of technical information, and promotes discussion of implementation issues that require community cooperation.

There are several methods for joining the nanog list.

This archive is updated hourly. The searchable index is updated nightly.

Date, Thread, Author,
Historical

Other Merit Archives

How to Join an E-Mail List

Aaron Glenn

• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  
• 06/27/05 Re: High court hands big victory to cabl
  
• 06/25/05 Re: [OT] network monitoring/visibility a
  
• 06/24/05 [OT] network monitoring/visibility appli
  

Abhishek Verma

• 06/27/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  

Alex Rubenstein

• 06/21/05 Re: NANOG Evolution
  
• 06/20/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Alexander Koch

• 06/21/05 Re: MCI routing loop near Chicago
  

Alexei Roudnev

• 06/19/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/04/05 Re: OT: NOC Display's
  

Allen Kitchen

• 06/13/05 Choice One router reboots? SW PA etc out
  

Andre Oppermann

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/10/05 Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's Send
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  

Andrew - Supernews

• 06/08/05 Re: Catalyst Flow Export wierdness.
  

Andrew Staples

• 06/22/05 RE: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Localized mail servers, global scope
  

Andrew White

• 06/01/05 NWN / ARCOS-1 please contact me off-list
  

Anne P. Mitchell, Esq.

• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

Barry Greene (bgreene)

• 06/23/05 RE: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/22/05 RE: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/13/05 RE: Best practice ACLs for a internet fa
  

Barry Shein

• 06/13/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/11/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/01/05 RE: Administration Asks Appeals Court To
  

Ben Hubbard

• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  

Betty Burke

• 06/17/05 NANOG Evolution
  

Bill Nash

• 06/08/05 Re: Catalyst Flow Export wierdness.
  
• 06/08/05 Netflow voodoo.
  
• 06/08/05 Catalyst Flow Export wierdness.
  

Bill Thompson

• 06/03/05 OT: ISP recommendations in Ontario
  

Bill Woodcock

• 06/13/05 Re: ISP's Contact List
  

bmanning

• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/02/05 Re: orsc root server?
  

Brad Knowles

• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/30/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/28/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/24/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/21/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/02/05 Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists
  
• 06/02/05 Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists
  

Brandon Butterworth

• 06/07/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

brett watson

• 06/20/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  

Bruce Campbell

• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  

Chip Mefford

• 06/03/05 Re: OT: NOC Display's
  

Chris Adams

• 06/04/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Chris Beggy

• 06/02/05 Re: OT: NOC Display's
  
• 06/02/05 Re: orsc root server?
  
• 06/02/05 orsc root server?
  

Chris Kuethe

• 06/01/05 Re: Administration Asks Appeals Court To
  

Christian Kuhtz

• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  

christian.macnevin

• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: NYSE Trading Halt Triggered by 'Netw
  
• 06/03/05 Re: Fwd: NYSE Trading Halt Triggered by
  

Christopher Chin

• 06/08/05 Re: Supercomm: Securing service provider
  

Christopher L. Morrow

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/29/05 RE: ATM
  
• 06/29/05 Re: FCC to probe DSL regulations
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  
• 06/21/05 Re: MCI routing loop near Chicago
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Supercomm: Securing service provider
  
• 06/04/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/04/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/04/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/03/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/03/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/02/05 Re: United.com having DNS issues?
  
• 06/02/05 Re: United.com having DNS issues?
  
• 06/01/05 United.com having DNS issues?
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  

Church, Chuck

• 06/15/05 RE: Document Action: 'BGP Wedgies' to In
  

cidr-report

• 06/24/05 The Cidr Report
  
• 06/03/05 The Cidr Report
  

Cisco Systems Product Security Incident Response Team

• 06/29/05 Cisco Security Advisory: RADIUS Authenti
  

codewarrior

• 06/23/05 openning party on 06/25/2005 11pm Coordi
  
• 06/06/05 Re: Slight OT: NASA World Wind project l
  

Colin Johnston

• 06/02/05 ICANN cannot decide, oh what fun we have
  

Curtis Doty

• 06/27/05 Re: High court hands big victory to cabl
  

Dan Evans

• 06/23/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/21/05 OSPF -vs- ISIS
  

Dan Mahoney, System Admin

• 06/03/05 Load Testing Util
  

Dan Riley

• 06/05/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  

Daniel Golding

• 06/24/05 Re: [OT] network monitoring/visibility a
  
• 06/21/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/17/05 [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolution
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/07/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/03/05 Re: OT: NOC Display's
  

Daniel Senie

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/13/05 RE: ISP's Contact List
  
• 06/13/05 RE: Best practice ACLs for a internet fa
  

Dave Crocker

• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming:
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/20/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/18/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/16/05 Informal email peering (was: Email peeri
  
• 06/14/05 Re: The IETF needs your input about the
  
• 06/13/05 The IETF needs your input about the Spam
  
• 06/11/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

Dave Stewart

• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/07/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

David Barak

• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  

David Brinks

• 06/06/05 Needed : AOL Network Contact
  

David Hubbard

• 06/06/05 SBC (AS 7132) contact?
  
• 06/03/05 RE: Load Testing Util
  

David Lesher

• 06/04/05 Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Deepak Jain

• 06/27/05 Re: Equinix Chicago Power Outage
  

Derek Diget

• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  

Dorian Kim

• 06/21/05 Re: NANOG Evolution
  

Doug Barton

• 06/30/05 New IANA IPv4 allocation for RIPE NCC (8
  
• 06/17/05 New IANA IPv4 allocations to ARIN (74/8,
  
• 06/09/05 New block of AS Numbers to APNIC (37888-
  

Douglas Otis

• 06/09/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

Dragos Ruiu

• 06/15/05 Re: Calculating Jitter
  

Drew Weaver

• 06/15/05 Considering switch from Black Diamond 68
  
• 06/13/05 Best practice ACLs for a internet facing
  
• 06/09/05 Using snort to detect if your users are
  
• 06/07/05 Is anyone from XO monitoring?
  
• 06/03/05 Anyone from Xeex?
  

Duane Wessels

• 06/24/05 Heads up: DNS survey traffic from 199.45
  

Edward B. Dreger

• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/18/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  

Edward Lewis

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  

Eric A. Hall

• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine

• 06/09/05 Fwd: ICANN Board Designates VeriSign ...
  

Eric Frazier

• 06/28/05 DHCP and aliases
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Calculating Jitter
  

Eric Gauthier

• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/22/05 Shared bandwidth and QoS
  
• 06/22/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  

Erik Haagsman

• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  

Erik Sundberg

• 06/06/05 RE: Juniper Routers with X switches
  

Fergie (Paul Ferguson)

• 06/30/05 U.S. Won't Cede Control of Net Computers
  
• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 Re: Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned
  
• 06/29/05 IESG statement on e-mail authentication
  
• 06/29/05 FCC to probe DSL regulations
  
• 06/29/05 VoIP-in-a-can: Sysco IP Phone Model TC-0
  
• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  
• 06/28/05 Brand X decision could mean widespread V
  
• 06/27/05 High court hands big victory to cable
  
• 06/22/05 E-Mail authentication fight looming: Mic
  
• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/15/05 FWD: Document Action: 'BGP Wedgies' to I
  
• 06/10/05 Two computers stolen with Motorola staff
  
• 06/08/05 Supercomm: Securing service provider net
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Reuters: Europe broadband surpasses Amer
  
• 06/07/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  
• 06/07/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/07/05 Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication....
  
• 06/02/05 NYSE Trading Halt Triggered by 'Network
  
• 06/02/05 The funny thing about e-mail handling...
  
• 06/02/05 ICANN approves new ".xxx" TLD
  
• 06/01/05 Paul Mockapetris recieves ACM SIGCOMM li
  

fkittred

• 06/22/05 Looking for feedback on Huawei Ethernet
  

Florian Weimer

• 06/09/05 Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  
• 06/02/05 Re: United.com having DNS issues?
  

Frank Coluccio

• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespr
  
• 06/07/05 Onsite Generation: A Reminder [was: Batt
  
• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Fred Baker

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Calculating Jitter
  

Frotzler, Florian

• 06/13/05 RE: Best practice ACLs for a internet fa
  

Gadi Evron

• 06/23/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/23/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/23/05 ISP phishing
  
• 06/07/05 drone armies C&C report - May/2005
  
• 06/03/05 OT: Israeli industrial espionage Trojan
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  

Geoff White

• 06/03/05 OT:ANNOUNCE: MailDroid Spam Fighting MFG
  

Giuliano Cardozo Medalha

• 06/06/05 Re: Juniper Routers with X switches
  

Hank Nussbacher

• 06/29/05 Re: VoIP-in-a-can: Sysco IP Phone Model
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/17/05 Re: The Cidr Report
  
• 06/13/05 RE: ISP's Contact List
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  

Hannigan, Martin

• 06/23/05 RE: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/20/05 RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/20/05 RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/20/05 RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/13/05 RE: ISP's Contact List
  
• 06/08/05 RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/06/05 RE: Changes to the Nanog Mailing List Ad
  
• 06/06/05 RE: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/01/05 RE: Administration Asks Appeals Court To
  

Henry Linneweh

• 06/08/05 RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  

Henry Yen

• 06/27/05 On a lighter note (for DataCenter operat
  
• 06/02/05 Re: United.com having DNS issues?
  
• 06/02/05 Re: United.com having DNS issues?
  
• 06/01/05 Re: United.com having DNS issues?
  

Herb Leong

• 06/21/05 Re: NANOG Evolution
  

Hitesh Patel

• 06/06/05 OT: Need a PA-A3-T3 in Oregon
  

J. Oquendo

• 06/08/05 Packet 8 / Eight x Eight contact
  

J.D. Falk

• 06/13/05 Re: Paper on Email Authentication (Autho
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Paper on Email Authentication (Autho
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

James Couzens

• 06/21/05 Re: MCI routing loop near Chicago
  
• 06/21/05 MCI routing loop near Chicago
  

james edwards

• 06/17/05 Telephone pedestals
  

James Laszko

• 06/29/05 RE: ATM
  

Janet Sullivan

• 06/13/05 Re: ISP's Contact List
  

Jared Mauch

• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  

Jason Frisvold

• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  

Jason L. Schwab

• 06/24/05 RE: [OT] authorize.net down for any of y
  

Jay Hennigan

• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Jay R. Ashworth

• 06/30/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/30/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  
• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Outage queries and notices (was Re: GBLX
  
• 06/06/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/06/05 Re: Needed : AOL Network Contact
  
• 06/02/05 Re: OT: NOC Display's
  

Jeff Murri

• 06/10/05 Calculating Jitter
  

Jeroen Massar

• 06/20/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/20/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/15/05 Re: Announcing long AS-sets tomorrow
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  
• 06/02/05 Re: orsc root server?
  

Jerry Pasker

• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/07/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Jim McBurnett

• 06/17/05 AT&T outage?
  
• 06/13/05 RE: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  

Joe Abley

• 06/24/05 [OT] GBLX to the courtesy phone
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  

Joe Maimon

• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  

Joe Shen

• 06/30/05 Re: Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned
  
• 06/29/05 Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned ?
  

Joe St Sauver

• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  

Joel Jaeggli

• 06/23/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/23/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/04/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Joel Perez

• 06/25/05 RE: Equinix Chicago Power Outage
  
• 06/08/05 RE: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/07/05 RE: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  
• 06/07/05 GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

John Bittenbender

• 06/01/05 Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists
  

John Levine

• 06/18/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/18/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/11/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

John Neiberger

• 06/07/05 Problems with Qwest Frame Relay?
  

John Payne

• 06/16/05 Re: Best Practice where BGP router is "d
  

Jon Lewis

• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/20/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/03/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  

Jonathan M. Slivko

• 06/17/05 RE: AT&T outage?
  
• 06/17/05 RE: AT&T outage?
  

Jordan Medlen

• 06/09/05 RE: Using snort to detect if your users
  

Joseph Grajewski

• 06/02/05 Fwd: NYSE Trading Halt Triggered by 'Net
  

Justin Kreger

• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Justin W. Pauler

• 06/08/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

Kevin

• 06/01/05 Re: Administration Asks Appeals Court To
  

Kim Onnel

• 06/13/05 Re: Best practice ACLs for a internet fa
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  

Kuhtz, Christian

• 06/30/05 RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/29/05 RE: ATM
  
• 06/29/05 RE: ATM
  
• 06/27/05 RE: High court hands big victory to cabl
  

Larry Smith

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  

Leslie Nobile

• 06/18/05 ARIN's new allocations from IANA
  

Lorenzo Colitti

• 06/24/05 AS-set results, new experiments 30/06/20
  
• 06/20/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/19/05 More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/15/05 Announcing long AS-sets tomorrow
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  
• 06/09/05 Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  

Luke Parrish

• 06/24/05 Re: Engineer headcount calculations
  
• 06/23/05 Engineer headcount calculations
  

Malayter, Christopher

• 06/25/05 Equinix Chicago Power Outage
  
• 06/06/05 Changes to the Nanog Mailing List Admini
  

Manav Bhatia

• 06/22/05 RE: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  

MarcoH

• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/20/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  

Mark Andrews

• 06/30/05 Re: Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned
  
• 06/29/05 Re: Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned
  

Mark Tombaugh

• 06/28/05 Re: ISP phishing
  

Marshall Eubanks

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Calculating Jitter
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Calculating Jitter
  
• 06/03/05 Re: NYSE Trading Halt Triggered by 'Netw
  

Martin Hepworth

• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  

Matt Bazan

• 06/24/05 [OT] authorize.net down for any of you?
  

Matt Ghali

• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/01/05 bay area cell service: tmo and cingular
  

Matt Mills

• 06/05/05 RE: Slight OT: NASA World Wind project l
  
• 06/05/05 Slight OT: NASA World Wind project looki
  

Matthew D. Fuller

• 06/29/05 Re: DHCP and aliases
  
• 06/24/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  

matthew zeier

• 06/25/05 rackmount DC power inverters?
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Best practice ACLs for a internet fa
  
• 06/13/05 2u colo @ 1 Wilshire
  

Micah McNelly

• 06/16/05 verisign
  

Michael Loftis

• 06/07/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Michael Painter

• 06/13/05 Re: ISP's Contact List
  

Michael.Dillon

• 06/29/05 Re: DHCP and aliases
  
• 06/24/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/20/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/02/05 Re: OT: NOC Display's
  
• 06/02/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  

Mikael Abrahamsson

• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  
• 06/15/05 Re: Considering switch from Black Diamon
  

Mike Bernico

• 06/21/05 RE: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  

Mike Donahue

• 06/08/05 OT: Request for Input - Paetec
  

Mike Leber

• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/18/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering
  

Network Fortius

• 06/01/05 Re: port 25 connections up?
  

Niels Bakker

• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/30/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Economics of spam
  
• 06/02/05 Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists
  

Nils Ketelsen

• 06/10/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  

Olivier Beauchemin (gmail)

• 06/28/05 Your considered opinion
  

Olsen, Jason

• 06/30/05 RE: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/06/05 RE: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/03/05 RE: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 RE: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  

Owen DeLong

• 06/01/05 Re: Administration Asks Appeals Court To
  

Pablo's Gmail

• 06/30/05 Equinox Power Failure
  
• 06/15/05 Alcatel 7670 RSP
  
• 06/15/05 Alcatel 7670 as RSP
  

Patrick W. Gilmore

• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  

Paul G

• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  

Paul Jasa

• 06/07/05 RE: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

Paul Vixie

• 06/29/05 Re: colo price matrix
  

Paul Wouters

• 06/28/05 Re: ISP phishing
  

Pete Templin

• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  
• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  

Peter Corlett

• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/14/05 Re: ISP's Contact List
  

Peter Dambier

• 06/24/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/24/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/02/05 Re: orsc root server?
  
• 06/02/05 Re: orsc root server?
  

Petri Helenius

• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/21/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/18/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Outage queries and notices (was Re:
  

Philip Lavine

• 06/29/05 ATM
  

Rachael Treu Gomes

• 06/07/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

Randy Bush

• 06/30/05 RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: NANOG Evolution
  
• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/20/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/17/05 Re: NANOG Evolution
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/14/05 Re: The IETF needs your input about the
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Active BGP Probing and large AS-sets
  
• 06/04/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/03/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/03/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/03/05 192.169.0.0
  
• 06/02/05 Re: United.com having DNS issues?
  

Ray Plzak

• 06/06/05 RE: Changes to the Nanog Mailing List Ad
  

Ricardo Patara

• 06/20/05 LACNIC's new allocation from IANA
  

Rich Kulawiec

• 06/23/05 Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming:
  
• 06/21/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/01/05 Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists
  

Richard A Steenbergen

• 06/30/05 Re: Equinox Power Failure
  
• 06/25/05 Re: Equinix Chicago Power Outage
  
• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/07/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  
• 06/07/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

Richmond, Jeff (ELI)

• 06/29/05 RE: ATM
  

Rik van Riel

• 06/07/05 RE: Slight OT: NASA World Wind project l
  

Rob Thomas

• 06/21/05 IANA IPv4 allocations and bogon updates:
  

Robert Boyle

• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/28/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/28/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/25/05 Re: rackmount DC power inverters?
  
• 06/24/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/23/05 Re: ISP phishing
  

Robert Brockway

• 06/13/05 Re: Best practice ACLs for a internet fa
  

Robert E.Seastrom

• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/18/05 Re: Telephone pedestals
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/06/05 Re: Juniper Routers with X switches
  

Robert Mathews

• 06/23/05 Level3
  

Routing Table Analysis

• 06/24/05 Weekly Routing Table Report
  
• 06/17/05 Weekly Routing Table Report
  
• 06/10/05 Weekly Routing Table Report
  
• 06/03/05 Weekly Routing Table Report
  

Sam Hayes Merritt, III

• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  

Sam Stickland

• 06/16/05 Best Practice where BGP router is "dista
  

Sanfilippo, Ted

• 06/13/05 RE: ISP's Contact List
  
• 06/13/05 ISP's Contact List
  

Scott Morris

• 06/30/05 RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 RE: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  

Scott Stursa

• 06/03/05 Re: HUMOR: ICANN Announces ".polinc" TLD
  

Sean Donelan

• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  
• 06/06/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  

Sharif Torpis

• 06/08/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

Spencer Wood

• 06/02/05 OT: NOC Display's
  

Stephane Bortzmeyer

• 06/16/05 Email peering (Was: Economics of SPAM [W
  

Stephen Sprunk

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ATM
  
• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

Stephen Stuart

• 06/03/05 Re: URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  

Steve Feldman

• 06/20/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/20/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/17/05 NANOG Program Committee Announcement
  
• 06/12/05 Program Committee nominees
  
• 06/08/05 Reminder: Open nominations for Program C
  

Steve Gibbard

• 06/21/05 RE: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/07/05 Re: GBLX congestion in Dallas area
  

Steve Sobol

• 06/11/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/11/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/02/05 Re: VerizonWireless.com Mail Blacklists
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  

Steven Champeon

• 06/01/05 Verizon is easily fooled by spamming zom
  

Steven Kalcevich

• 06/19/05 books
  

Steven M. Bellovin

• 06/29/05 Re: FCC to probe DSL regulations
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

sthaug

• 06/13/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  

Suresh Ramasubramanian

• 06/30/05 Re: Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/29/05 sprintsvc.com mailops contact please?
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/20/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/17/05 Re: Email peering
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/13/05 Re: ISP's Contact List
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/06/05 Re: Needed : AOL Network Contact
  
• 06/02/05 Could someone from broadwing.net DNS ops
  

Susan Harris

• 06/21/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  
• 06/02/05 Meeting stats from Seattle
  

Ted Fischer

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  

Thor Lancelot Simon

• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  

Todd Reed

• 06/05/05 Juniper Routers with X switches
  

Todd Underwood

• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/30/05 Re: OMB: IPv6 by June 2008
  
• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/23/05 Re: md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  
• 06/22/05 md5 for bgp tcp sessions
  

Todd Vierling

• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/30/05 Re: mobile user strawman argument
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/20/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/01/05 RE: Administration Asks Appeals Court To
  

Tom Sands

• 06/17/05 Re: AT&T outage?
  

Tony Finch

• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  

Tony Li

• 06/21/05 Re: More long AS-sets announced
  
• 06/21/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  

trainier

• 06/09/05 Re: Using snort to detect if your users
  
• 06/03/05 Re: Load Testing Util
  

Valdis.Kletnieks

• 06/23/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/11/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/10/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/02/05 Re: OT: NOC Display's
  
• 06/02/05 Re: orsc root server?
  
• 06/01/05 Re: Verizon is easily fooled by spamming
  

Vicky Rode

• 06/29/05 Re: colo price matrix
  
• 06/29/05 colo price matrix
  

vijay gill

• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  
• 06/20/05 Re: [NON-OPERATIONAL] Re: NANOG Evolutio
  

W. Mark Herrick, Jr.

• 06/28/05 Re: Brand X decision could mean widespre
  

W.D.McKinney

• 06/05/05 Re: Battery Maint in LEC equipment
  
• 06/04/05 Re: 192.169.0.0
  

Wayne E. Bouchard

• 06/25/05 Re: Equinix Chicago Power Outage
  
• 06/21/05 Re: OSPF -vs- ISIS
  

will

• 06/03/05 URPF on small BGP-enabled customers?
  

william(at)elan.net

• 06/30/05 Re: Is my BIND Server's Cache Poisioned
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/29/05 Re: ISP phishing
  
• 06/23/05 Re: Localized mail servers, global scope
  
• 06/22/05 Re: E-Mail authentication fight looming:
  
• 06/18/05 the mother of all credit card data theft
  
• 06/16/05 Re: Email peering (Was: Economics of SPA
  
• 06/13/05 Re: Paper on Email Authentication (Autho
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/13/05 Paper on Email Authentication (Authoriza
  
• 06/13/05 Re: The IETF needs your input about the
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/13/05 RE: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/13/05 Re: IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact
  
• 06/13/05 IP->Country Data (RE: ISP's Contact List
  
• 06/11/05 Re: Economics of SPAM [Was: Micorsoft's
  
• 06/09/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/08/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/07/05 Re: Micorsoft's Sender ID Authentication
  
• 06/03/05 HUMOR: ICANN Announces ".polinc" TLD for
  
• 06/02/05 Re: orsc root server?
  

First Page | Prev Page | Next Page | Last Page

Previous month