Merit Network
Can't find what you're looking for? Search the Mail Archives.
  About Merit   Services   Network   Resources & Support   Network Research   News   Events   Home

Discussion Communities: Merit Network Email List Archives

North American Network Operators Group

Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | Thread Index | Author Index | Historical

Re: BCP regarding TOS transparancy for internet traffic

  • From: Sean Donelan
  • Date: Wed May 25 20:12:41 2005

On Wed, 25 May 2005, Eric A. Hall wrote:
> If they don't need or want special handling what are they paying for? But
> since they are paying for it, perhaps its up to you to figure out how to
> deliver on your promise.

If existing software applications only set the DSCP values when the user
asked, it wouldn't be as much of a problem.  However some software
programmers gratuitously set DSCP/TOS values even when the user didn't
want it.

If you drop packets from unauthorized DSCP/TOS users you will break many
applications for users which are unable to change the behaivor of their
application.

On the other hand, if you clear DSCP/TOS bits from unauthorized users
you will continue to provide basic service for those users.

Which is better?

	Dropping the packets with unauthorized DSCP/TOS bits?
	Forwarding the packets with cleared DSCP/TOS bits?





Discussion Communities


About Merit | Services | Network | Resources & Support | Network Research
News | Events | Contact | Site Map | Merit Network Home


Merit Network, Inc.