North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: [dnsop] DNS Anycast revisited (fwd)
- From: Edward B. Dreger
- Date: Wed May 04 00:09:07 2005
PWG> Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 23:56:48 -0400
PWG> From: Patrick W. Gilmore
PWG> I was just talking about people setting up anycast name servers, each
PWG> of which pointed at a different HTTP server (or other service), to
PWG> spread load. In many cases, the two servers are the same.
Ah, okay... which again helps demonstrate the lack of coupling between
*cast and coherency. A single unicast DNS server can serve split views
just as easily.
PWG> No, it disproves. You say "it will not / cannot work". Showing you
PWG> a working instance in production absolutely disproves your statement.
PWG>
PWG> You can say "it might break", but that's a different statement.
Yes. I misread/misthought "disproves will not / cannot work" as "proves
can / will work".
Speaking of things that, and people who, are incoherent... ;-)
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc@brics.com -*- jfconmaapaq@intc.net -*- sam@everquick.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.
|
