North American Network Operators Group
Date Prev | Date Next |
Date Index |
Thread Index |
Author Index |
Historical
Re: Schneier: ISPs should bear security burden
- From: Mark Newton
- Date: Thu Apr 28 02:56:13 2005
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 02:16:36AM -0400, Steven J. Sobol wrote:
> Any IP that a provider allows servers on should have
> distinctive, non-dynamic-looking DNS (and preferably be in a separate
> netblock from the dynamically-assigned IPs).
What the hell is a "non-dynamic-looking DNS"? Sure, if I see something
like "static-192-168-1-1.isp.net" I can be reasonably sure that it's
non-dynamic-looking, but what does the same thing look like in
Portugese? German? Spanish? French? (Korean? Chinese?)
Just wait'll we start getting unicode DNS names in non-English alphabets.
Perhaps then you can tell what to look for in a string of Kanji symbols
which might be suggestive of the concept of "static".
- mark
--
Mark Newton Email: newton@internode.com.au (W)
Network Engineer Email: newton@atdot.dotat.org (H)
Internode Systems Pty Ltd Desk: +61-8-82282999
"Network Man" - Anagram of "Mark Newton" Mobile: +61-416-202-223
|